<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How speed improving using single quotes instead of double quotes really is</title>
	<atom:link href="http://web.enavu.com/daily-tip/how-speed-improving-using-single-quotes-instead-of-double-quotes-really-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://web.enavu.com/daily-tip/how-speed-improving-using-single-quotes-instead-of-double-quotes-really-is/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:57:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Boba</title>
		<link>http://web.enavu.com/daily-tip/how-speed-improving-using-single-quotes-instead-of-double-quotes-really-is/comment-page-1/#comment-1381</link>
		<dc:creator>Boba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tutsvalley.com/?p=324#comment-1381</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment.

Which extra variables are you referring to?

First of all, i tested it with ONLY text, a really BIG text :)

Second of all, i didn&#039;t say single quotes aren&#039;t faster, that&#039;s logical, the php engine doesn&#039;t check for variables in it.

What i wanted to point out in this little article is that the overall speed of a page load won&#039;t make much difference, after all, why would a visitor care how much time the php engine needed, he cares how much time the page needs to load.

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment.</p>
<p>Which extra variables are you referring to?</p>
<p>First of all, i tested it with ONLY text, a really BIG text <img src='http://web.enavu.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Second of all, i didn&#8217;t say single quotes aren&#8217;t faster, that&#8217;s logical, the php engine doesn&#8217;t check for variables in it.</p>
<p>What i wanted to point out in this little article is that the overall speed of a page load won&#8217;t make much difference, after all, why would a visitor care how much time the php engine needed, he cares how much time the page needs to load.<br />
 <img src='http://web.enavu.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Carroll</title>
		<link>http://web.enavu.com/daily-tip/how-speed-improving-using-single-quotes-instead-of-double-quotes-really-is/comment-page-1/#comment-1380</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Carroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tutsvalley.com/?p=324#comment-1380</guid>
		<description>Good attempt, but this is worthless. This is all done in the PHP lexer, if you want to see the difference you shouldn&#039;t introduce extra variables; you should strip out the pertinent code, and truly benchmark the difference of single-quote vs double quote. Chances are single-quote are faster. Maybe *5* times faster!!! But, 5 times faster on a trivial worthless operation like enabling variable interpolation on a string without variables, is pretty useless in the grand scheme of thing.

Your conclusion, to be logically sound, should read that it isn&#039;t material to the user experience. Not that the speed difference doesn&#039;t exist at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good attempt, but this is worthless. This is all done in the PHP lexer, if you want to see the difference you shouldn&#8217;t introduce extra variables; you should strip out the pertinent code, and truly benchmark the difference of single-quote vs double quote. Chances are single-quote are faster. Maybe *5* times faster!!! But, 5 times faster on a trivial worthless operation like enabling variable interpolation on a string without variables, is pretty useless in the grand scheme of thing.</p>
<p>Your conclusion, to be logically sound, should read that it isn&#8217;t material to the user experience. Not that the speed difference doesn&#8217;t exist at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boba</title>
		<link>http://web.enavu.com/daily-tip/how-speed-improving-using-single-quotes-instead-of-double-quotes-really-is/comment-page-1/#comment-1379</link>
		<dc:creator>Boba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tutsvalley.com/?p=324#comment-1379</guid>
		<description>Yup, just find out what&#039;s easier for you and keep with that. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, just find out what&#8217;s easier for you and keep with that. <img src='http://web.enavu.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Kornblum</title>
		<link>http://web.enavu.com/daily-tip/how-speed-improving-using-single-quotes-instead-of-double-quotes-really-is/comment-page-1/#comment-1378</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Kornblum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tutsvalley.com/?p=324#comment-1378</guid>
		<description>Interesting. So the more important thing to do is to be consistent with that as you would with any other part of the code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. So the more important thing to do is to be consistent with that as you would with any other part of the code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
